![kadiri lakshmi narasimha swamy temple contact number kadiri lakshmi narasimha swamy temple contact number](https://kalyangeetha.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/070920160932-hr-lakshmi-narasimha-swamy-temple-sai-nagar-kadiri-andhra-pradesh-.jpg)
![kadiri lakshmi narasimha swamy temple contact number kadiri lakshmi narasimha swamy temple contact number](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/65muwCJ4V8E/maxresdefault.jpg)
Against that order of the Deputy Commissioner, the Managing Trustee who is the third respondent in this writ petition filed a Revision under Section 18 of the Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act before the Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration) Department, Hyderabad. Against this order, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner for Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (Administration) Department, Kurnool who allowed the appeal holding that the petitioner is not guilty under any one of the counts. He therefore removed him from his Office. 41-58 dated 28-11-58, whereby he found the petitioner guilty under all the six charges and held that the petitioner is not qualified to continue, as Acharyapurusha. The petitioner submitted his reply to the said charges but the Executive Officer of the temple passed the order R.C No. that the Acharyapurusha made a false allegation to justify his absence from attending the day time Sathumurai, that Sathumurai is observed only during nights in the temple.Ģ. that the Acharyapurusha has been absenting himself without the permission of authorities concerned from attending the day time Sathumurai ritual every day.Ħ. that the Acharyapurusha wilfully failed to report to the temple authorities the irregularities of not reciting Vedic Hymns behind the procession of God during Brahmotsavam days and that the Acharyapurusha has committed default in the discharge of this duty.ĥ. that the Acharyapurusha to justify his failure of reciting Vedic Hymns behind procession of God during Brabmotsavam days states that the temple authorities have given up this Kainkatyam these many years.Ĥ. that the Acharyapurusha has failed to recite Vedic Hymns behind the procession of God during Brahmotsavam days these many years.ģ. that the Acharyapurusha has failed to produce a certificate of his knowledge of Vaikansa Agamas prevailing in the temple or otherwise failed to prove as required by the executive authority.Ģ. 107 of 1929, According to the petitioner, he was attending to the duties of his office as Acharyapurusha regularly, but by an order dated 4-11-1958, the first respondent in this writ petition, the Executive Officer of the said temple served on him the following six charges ġ. Ramacharlu, was declared entitled to the office of “Acharyapurusha” in the temple called Sri Lskshmi Narasimhaswamy Temple in Kadiri, Anantapur District by the decree dated the 30th day of September, 1932 passed by the District Court, Anantapur in A.S No.